Y 90
710
alignment the same as proposed by the Consulting Engineers but only building a wall similar to that now being built at the Northern end of the Yard, which would allow junks to lie alongside at high water or bow on at low water.
The cost of these various schemes are approximately:
Scheme (a).....$751,000
(b).....$692,000
(c).....$642,000
(d).....$130,000
I could not advise the Government to adopt either "b" or "c", the difference between either of these and "a" being too small to make it worth while building temporary walls, as "b" and "c" must necessarily be when a permanent wall such as scheme "a" provides could be built for such a small amount more.
It therefore lies between "a" and "d". If money were forthcoming I would certainly advise "a" as I feel confident that the port will develop to such an extent in a few years' time as to make provision for berthing many more vessels alongside wharves a necessity,
As regards scheme "d" I can quite easily design a yard to suit this scheme, which while not interfering with the future construction of scheme "a", would very easily be enlarged to suit at any future date the larger scheme.
A deep sea wall such as proposed in scheme "a" would take the best part of 24 years to build and would if decided on now be just ready for use when the line is opened for traffic. The Government ought therefore to decide at once whether it is prepared to spend the $751,000 on this scheme and be ready for any emergencies which the trade of the Colony might require or be content with the smaller scheme "d" for the present requirements.
I have etc.,
(sd.) G. W. Xves,
Chief Resident Engineer.
ahoontyc JnoblasЯ tel:0
,801110
sidaronoli adz of
„VISIS1998 Latnolo? ONT
.braY nolta‡8 noolwoX
› #ŠNOMEYNATrà abooð
718
Y 90
710
alignment the same as proposed by the Consulting Engineers but only building a wall similar to that now being built at the Korthern end of the Yard, which would allow junks to lie along-. -side at high water or bow on at low water.
The cost of these various schemes are ap-
-proximately:-
Scheme (a)..
(b)..
•
(a).....
#
(d)........
.$751,000.
.$692,000.
.$642,000.
.$130,000.
aswwgli ezioa evty of nottiaoq a al von mm I
mmoja add to bre add toandoo od «Ilaw to negyd awolnav said tot
-dacijas evad I doideaemeriɔa wot era storit
Elsusov gałog sne gatysi tot sidestue era saedt to E,tot ben
minst to? yino eno bra sbiɛ anois
-:@wo[[o] es sia vaɗT
•
bue ant galtsengos vol sardon Ianigiro edt .(a)
ser qaab a yď zað e1basrixomis dikw nłarb rots” miotë add to
-tabormoons bna noktamsiosf insasig sốt na snil ames erit mi Ilaw
panol Jee1 002 Juodɗa bra diørb test 48 to eno eifoneer & gal-
SS to bridíš odd bra gnoj dset 08) bna thanh test 08 to redjong
.gnol Jast 082 caía bna tla~k toot
gnitivano) edð yď banoqorq snål ant .(6) :
„Jee1 OZI Juoda "■" to sail náð mort doaɗ taa galed arsenign
dignel s 70? Jes1 06 to ebla gnola Jisib a svad bluow Law nidT
of rebro ni „Jest dae to disgael a 101 2861-65 to bɛa teet Oda to
aniyberb to Laub Jasny a (løw brit eblagnols darb aldt Jog
001 Juoda tot bus Ilaw odit obiegnois d‡od Visaaezen ed bluow
«Ilaw ort mot duo feat
guiqoed vɗ Jitud ed bivoo Ilaw reqasdo & .(o)
Innoma ogiai ant znibiova on bna duo randu? #IJIRI 3 Ilaw sit
.ebiɛgnola ati of nisseev ndt wolls of galyberb to
-nglis sdt gaiqeed to atalanos smedow alɗT .(b)
I could not advise the Government to adopt
either "b" or "c", the difference between either of these and "a" being too small to make it worth while building temporary walls, as "b" and "c" must necessarily be when a permanent wall such as scheme "a" provides could be built for such a small
amount.more.
It therefore lies between "a" and "d". If money were forthcoming I would certainly advise "a" as I feel confident that the port will develop to 'such an extent in a few years time as to make provision for berthing many more vessels alongside wharves a necessity,
As regards scheme "d" I can quite easily design a yard to suit this scheme, which while not interfering with the future construction of scheme "a", would very easily be enlarged to suit at any future date the larger scheme,
A deep sea wall such as proposed in scheme *a* would take the best part of 24 years to build and would if decided on now be just ready for use when the line is opened for traffic, The Government ought therefore to decide at once : whether it is prepared to spend the $751,000 on this scheme and be ready for any emergencies which the trade of the Colony might require or be content with the smaller scheme "d" for the
present requirements.
I have etc.,
(sd.) G. W. Xves,
Chief Resident İngineer.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.